Architecture
One vantage point. Every agent surface.
Behavry sits inline across every surface an agent acts on, observing, reconstructing, and signing the Decision Trace from a position no single vendor holds. This is what the fourth A requires: independent, cross-perimeter, deterministic.
Observe → Reconstruct → System of record → earn enforcement.
Every agent action, across every surface. A complete event stream.
Delegation lineage and behavioral trajectory, into the signed Decision Trace.
One independently verifiable record, consumed by every role unchanged.
Permit or block at the boundary, once trust is proven. Never the lead.
Every action passes through one place.
Agent surfaces
Microsoft Copilot Salesforce Einstein Claude Cursor Internal agents
Behavry
Observe · reconstruct · sign the Decision Trace
INLINE · STRUCTURALLY INDEPENDENT
Tools & platforms
Files CRM Code Email Production systems
Six connection methods. And growing.
However your agents connect, Behavry binds identity and captures the action. No surface is out of reach.
One-click enrollment for Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Zed and seven more. Any other MCP client works too.
OpenAI · Anthropic · Gemini · Ollama and other providers.
12 AI web services · telemetry + DLP at the edge.
Enforcement over 24 provider APIs at the desktop boundary, 13 of them consumer chat UIs.
Identity binding for custom and internal agents.
Ollama, vLLM, LM Studio and nine more, fingerprinted by process and on-disk artifact.
New surfaces added as agents reach them. Coverage is a moving target, by design.
Ask where, not what.
Any tool that answers with a variation of we monitor, we detect, or we alert is operating after execution. The structurally important question is where the record is produced. Behavry produces it inline, from a position the agent, its vendor, and the SIEM cannot reach.
In the path of the action, before it reaches the target.
Signed by a control plane the agent cannot inspect or modify.
One vantage across vendors, not stitched from many logs.
We'll walk your agent surfaces and show where the record gets produced
Put this architecture to the question.
There is an agent on this page, and it is a Behavry workload like the ones described above. Every source it reads and every tool it calls is authorized inline before it happens, from a position it does not control. Ask it what you would ask an architect, then open its Decision Trace and check the answer against the record.
Answers are grounded in these pages and cited. If it cannot source an answer, it says so rather than inventing one
- MCP AUTHORIZATION
Inline enforcement at the tool call, evaluated before the call executes.
- THE DECISION TRACE
What the agent did, why it was allowed, and a record anyone can verify without us.
- INTEGRATIONS
Where Behavry sits alongside the systems you already run.
See the architecture on your stack.
BOOK A BRIEFING →